Logic Puzzle #9: Does my Unknown contain Br, Cl, S and/or Si atoms? … Solution 2

Atoms like Br, Cl, S and Si present distinct isotope patterns on a mass spectrum. The isotope pattern for a single Br or Cl atom tends to be relatively straightforward and can be viewed directly off the spectrum. In the case for S and Si atoms, a little math is generally required to reveal their presence or absence.

The careful analysis of the intensity for the A+2 signal (m/z 156.0) at 13 eV offers a good notion as to whether any of the following atoms Br, Cl, S or Si are present. The contributions of the isotopes ⁸¹Br, ³⁷Cl, ³⁴S and ³⁰Si to the A+2 signal are related to the isotope-abundance and are listed by IUPAC at ~49.3, 24.2, 4.2 and 3.1%, respectively. Please note that the contributions to the A+2 signal from ¹³C₂, ¹³C⁸⁰Br, ¹³C³⁶Cl, ¹³C³³S and ¹³C³⁰Si will be considered ~0.0% to simply the calculations.

Since the intensity of the A signal (m/z 154.0) is 78.3% at 13 eV, then the intensity of the A+2 signal will be the following if the corresponding atom(s) is present:

1 Br ~76.1% (=78.3*1*49.3/(100-49.3))

2 Br ~152.3% (=78.3*2*49.3/(100-49.3))

1 Cl ~25.0% (=78.3*1*24.2/(100-24.2))

2 Cl ~50.0 % (=78.3*2*24.2/(100-24.2))

1 S ~3.4% (=78.3*1*4.2/(100-4.2))

2 S ~6.9% (=78.3*2*4.2/(100-4.2))

1 Si ~2.5% (=78.3*1*3.1/(100-3.1))

2 Si ~5.0% (=78.3*2*3.1/(100-3.1))

According to the calculations, Br, Cl, S and Si are not present as they do not match the experimental intensity of the A+2 signal at 1.0%.

Formula:

1. % Intensity of A+2 signal = % Intensity of A signal * (Contribution of ^a+2X + Contribution of ¹³C₂ + Contribution of ¹³C^a+1X + …)

2. Contribution of Isotope = Number of Atoms * % abundance / (100 - % abundance)

Logic Puzzle #9: Does my Unknown contain Br, Cl, S and/or Si atoms? … Solution

There are two approaches to solving this problem set. The "quick" approach is to subtract the mass of 10 carbon atoms from the mass of the molecular mass and see if the difference can account for the atoms Br, Cl, S and/or Si. The "longer" approach is to examine the isotope patterns on the MS and the relative abundance of the respective isotopes.

According to the MS below, the molecular ion (M^+.) most probably corresponds to be the most intense signal at m/z 154.0. Given 10 carbons atoms, the difference is 34 Da (154.0 – 120 Da). Therefore, isotopes 79Br and 35Cl can be ruled out leaving either one atom of 32S or 28Si for the unknown. The molecular formula for the unknown could be C10 S1 H2 or C10 Si1 H6.

 
The subsequent post will examine the isotope pattern and thus examine whether the proposed molecular formulae are consistent with the MS data.

Blog on Hiatus from November 1 to 12



I will be on the road again for the next 2 weeks with more business travel. This time, I will be touring a variety of Universities and Colleges in Texas and Ohio. Unfortunately for the P2C2E readers, the blog will be on hiatus for the next 2 weeks. Posts will resume the following week.

Logic Puzzle #9: Does my Unknown contain Br, Cl, S and/or Si atoms?

Characteristic isotopic patterns in MS can assist the elucidator in revealing the presence or absence of atoms. For the Br, Cl, S and Si atoms, a good approach is to examine the peak intensity of the A+2 signal. The respective contributions by the isotopes 81Br, 37Cl, 34S and 30Si are approximately 49.3, 24.3, 4.2 and 3.1%, respectively.

Below are the molecular ion regions for two EI mass spectra for the same unknown compound. The top MS was collected at 13 eV and the bottom was collected at 70 eV. A list of m/z and intensities are also provided. Given the carbon count to be 10 atoms, are any of the following atoms Br, Cl, S and/or Si present?

 
 
A special thanks goes to Scott Van Bramer for allowing me to use the data.

Blog on Hiatus for the week of October 18 to October 22

Since I just returned home from a forensic conference (SOFT), the blog P2C2E will be on hiatus for this week from October 18 to October 22. Posts will resume the following week.

Logic Puzzle #8: Strong Coupling or Peak Overlap? … Solution

There are two approaches to deciding which scenario best fits the NMR data in the puzzle. A structure elucidator can provide evidence that one scenario is more probable than an other and/or eliminate one scenario on the grounds of insufficient/contradictory data to support it.

For the following 1H NMR spectrum, if the integral of the doublet at 7.42 ppm equates to 1 H atom from a single structure, then the 1H signals at 7.58-7.59 ppm integrating to 2.57 (and assuming all signals are accounted for) relate to overlapping signals (probably a doublet overlapping with a singlet) from a mixture of compounds at varying concentrations.

Another approach, as Adolfo has nicely provided, the magnitude of the strong coupling demonstrated by the signals at 7.58-7.59 ppm indicates a nearby partner on the left side circa 7.70 ppm. Since this appears not to be the case, then by process of elimination, the signals at 7.58-7.59 ppm relate to two overlapping multiplets.

 

Logic Puzzle #8: Strong Coupling or Peak Overlap?

The goal of this puzzle is to distinguish between strong coupling and peak overlap.

For the following 1H NMR spectrum, are the 1H signals at 7.58-7.59 ppm exhibiting strong coupling or are they two overlapping multiplets or both?